This text is featured in Bitcoin Journal’s “The Major Concern”. Click on right here to get your Annual Bitcoin Journal Subscription.
Click on right here to obtain a PDF of this text.
Tuesday, August twenty ninth @ 11:36 AM
The next is an interview with Brian Consolvo, Principal–Expertise Danger at KPMG. He’s a co-author of KPMG’s new report “Bitcoin’s function within the ESG crucial” alongside KPMG’s Director of ESG and Local weather Advisory Kirk-Patrick Caron. The report is a major milestone in mainstream Bitcoin discourse, significantly on environmental grounds, and represents some extent of convergence between pro-Bitcoin environmental advocates and a wider swath of the skilled world concerned within the ESG panorama.
For a few years, Bitcoiners have taken situation with the narratives put forth by these with an unfavorable view of the expertise, and have been annoyed with unfounded and hysterical claims from Bitcoin detractors on its environmental and social deserves.
This interview covers the latest KPMG report and has been edited for concision and readability. The views of co-author Brian Consolvo are his personal and don’t essentially symbolize the attitude of KPMG.
Nichols: To kick issues off, what was the impetus behind penning this report? Why did you determine to have a look at Bitcoin by an ESG lens, and was there something particularly that prompted that?
Consolvo: If I simply suppose again to the period of time I’ve been on this house and seeing what among the critics put forth about Bitcoin, after which going by my very own journey with KPMG, who is clearly very massive on ESG, you begin going by every of the classes and are available throughout plenty of the advantages that Bitcoin offers — each the asset and the expertise. It’s attention-grabbing as a result of lots of people assault the vitality consumption, which once more is just one a part of the ESG framework, however I feel I’d by no means actually seen anybody take a full try at explaining all the advantages that it offers throughout all three pillars.
The massive impetus was the article that got here out again in January-February by the New York Occasions that attacked Bitcoin’s vitality consumption. I believed, “Hey it is a actually good time for me to make use of my platform to doc all the advantages, all the general public good that Bitcoin does”. I form of had a elementary thought about what I used to be going to place within the paper, however as I began researching, I began coming throughout all these different issues I had by no means even considered. I feel the paper did a fairly good job of displaying how a lot good it does versus simply the identical form of FUD we hear day in and time out.
Nichols: Why do you suppose there may be a lot FUD on the market? The place and why does this FUD emanate, and what can we do to resolve it?
Consolvo: For me, it comes right down to training. Bitcoin is simply such a posh matter. It’s not one thing that most individuals perceive very nicely. Once I return to once I first began to analysis Bitcoin and do my very own homework on it, it took me some time. It was form of irritating since you’re like: “What am I lacking right here? Why don’t I get this?”, as a result of it’s simply not foundational ideas that we’re all used to. It requires you to be open-minded to not simply how Bitcoin works, however to know what issues it’s truly fixing. So you then begin to perceive how Bitcoin works, however earlier than you possibly can even go any additional, you begin having to analysis economics and you need to begin being an skilled in vitality consumption and issues like that. It’s only a very broad vary of matters that Bitcoin begins to the touch.
I feel the report does a fairly good job of claiming “Sure, Bitcoin does use plenty of vitality, however I don’t suppose vitality consumption is absolutely the problem right here”, and we have to actually deal with the emissions behind that vitality manufacturing. I’d flip it round and ask someone who’s a staunch Bitcoin critic: “Should you’re involved concerning the quantity of vitality that it’s utilizing, if the world might snap its fingers and transfer to a completely sustainable vitality combine, would you continue to assault the vitality consumption?” I don’t suppose they might. In order that’s why you need to actually convey it again to the emissions, however then additionally have a look at the ways in which it’s truly serving to with the transition to extra sustainable vitality and the best way it’s capable of assist monetize a few of these tasks.
![](https://bitcoinmagazine.com/.image/c_fit%2Ccs_srgb%2Cfl_progressive%2Cq_auto:good%2Cw_620/MjAyNTQwMDQ0ODE1MTgwODEy/primary-inline-cta.jpg)
Nichols: You delineate between Scope One and Scope Two emissions as they relate to Bitcoin. Are you able to stroll us by that? What’s Bitcoin’s emissions profile and the way do you contextualize the emissions Bitcoin is related to?
Consolvo: Folks hear about all of the environmental impacts of Bitcoin and we tried to make it clear within the paper: Scope One emissions are just about zero for Bitcoin, it’s simply utilizing electrical energy.
It’s humorous as a result of, I suppose society sees electrical autos as zero-emission autos which for essentially the most half, that’s comparatively true — they’re not utilizing combustion and gasoline and so forth., they’re working on electrical energy. Bitcoin is not any totally different. Bitcoin runs off electrical energy. However, the place the Scope Two emissions come from is: The place is that vitality coming from? Is it coming from an influence plant burning fossil fuels, or is it coming from a photo voltaic or wind farm? That’s the place we attempt to make that distinction within the paper.
One of many issues my ESG counterpart Kirk-Patrick Caron truly identified to me within the paper is that some bitcoin mining truly does have Scope One emissions. If you consider utilizing flared gasoline, you’re utilizing one thing that enters into the ambiance at the very least to a point. So I feel behind the meter, mining does have some Scope One emissions, however by and enormous, the trade is primarily zero emissions because it pertains to Scope One.
Nichols: I need to dig down somewhat bit extra into the pure gasoline element of this. Your report mentions Crusoe Vitality in addition to Vespene. Are you able to describe what individuals are utilizing this vented methane for and form of what the potential of this may be when it comes to lowering GHG emissions from a market-based mechanism? There’s pure incentive right here, which I discover pretty novel.
Consolvo: If you consider Crusoe Vitality and their partnership with Exxon to co-locate round what they’re doing across the oil and gasoline wells — an organization like Crusoe can co-locate subsequent to them and quite than letting that methane enter the ambiance straight, they convert it to vitality use. So now you might have an organization like Exxon who not solely is ready to cut back the greenhouse gasses that they’re answerable for, however they’re capable of monetize it.
So the query that I’m asking is: Why the hell isn’t each single oil and gasoline producer reaching out and partnering with bitcoin miners to do precisely that?
A few of it’s only a matter of notion with a few of these corporations. However once more, I feel it goes again to training. Think about being an enormous government at some oil and gasoline producer and somebody’s telling you, “Hey we have to accomplice with these bitcoin miners and right here’s why”. You’re in all probability pondering, “Wait a minute. That sounds form of loopy”, proper? Particularly given preconceived notions you might need about Bitcoin. However I feel that’s one thing that may probably change over time given the profit that every celebration has.
Nichols: So far as how a lot landfill pure gasoline is on the market, are you able to converse to that so far as the potential of Bitcoin to seize this? You do point out Vespene within the report, I’d be curious for a bit extra shade there.
Consolvo: They have been in all probability one of many really distinctive use instances that I got here throughout earlier than doing the paper. They’re principally co-locating at landfills to make use of the methane that seeps out of these areas — I feel landfills are one of many greatest contributors of greenhouse gases, in order that’s one other instance that you might begin to see much more adoption simply given the advantages to each events and what it may possibly assist do to your greenhouse gasoline emission profile.
Nichols: The final piece on the vitality topic I’d wish to go over is the grid administration side of Bitcoin so far as demand response. You point out winter storm Uri in Texas for example. Are you able to converse to the significance of balancing load on the grid and what function Bitcoin can play in that? Why is demand response vital for the grid as we convey extra renewable vitality era on-line?
Consolvo: I’m not an vitality skilled, however I feel the lengthy and in need of it’s when you might have a public utility that’s producing energy, they need to generate extra energy than they’re truly going to make use of, given the totally different fluctuations in demand all through the day. It’s known as a duck curve, the place the quantity of energy that we use fluctuates all through the day and it form of seems like a duck while you map it out on a chart: Most energy consumption takes place across the early night when everybody’s getting dwelling from work. Let’s say we get dwelling from work at 6 p.m. Nicely, at 6 o’clock in December, the solar’s not shining, so that you’re probably not capable of faucet into photo voltaic vitality. Wind provide could be a little bit extra problematic, simply given the shortage of enough predictability.
However what demand response does is, when sure occasions happen on this instance, winter storm Uri — granted, there have been some main points that occurred with the precise infrastructure that prompted a few of these issues to occur. However miners are incentivized to close off as a result of the facility begins to turn out to be too costly. So that they get past their breakeven level in the event that they weren’t capable of shut down or they didn’t shut down.
Nicely, now everybody’s paying a major value for vitality. There are some laws on that so I’ll watch out with how far I am going with this, however they’re principally capable of stability the value and the economics of all of it, as a result of they’ll shut down at a second’s discover, just about. And so they’ll do this the minute the value to mine turns into too costly. They’re capable of give plenty of that energy again to the grid when it truly wants it.
Nichols: What would your response be to somebody who says “bitcoin mining is a waste of vitality”? I feel you’ve completed a superb job of displaying the utility of bitcoin mining so far as grid administration, emissions reductions and monetizing wasted renewable vitality, however that might function a pleasant segway into the S and G components of the ESG dialogue.
Consolvo: The very first thing I’d say these days is, “Hey, to every their very own”. There are in all probability issues I would really feel which are a waste of vitality for individuals too. How a lot time do individuals spend video gaming, proper? I don’t have any situation with that, however that’s fantastic should you suppose it’s a waste of vitality. The place I begin to suppose there’s an issue is that if coverage is influenced primarily based on whether or not or not you suppose your use of electrical energy is any extra useful than mine.
If I need to mine bitcoin in my home, if I need to mine bitcoin at scale, like a big bitcoin miner, I’m paying for that vitality similar to you’re. There shouldn’t be any stipulations or further guidelines like this tax that’s been talked about on miners. To me, that doesn’t appear to be that’s a good remedy. You’re entitled to your opinion, and I respect anybody’s opinion on whether or not or not they suppose it’s helpful or not. However, I feel to me, that’s in the end what it comes right down to.
Now to reply your second query when it comes to the social side, I feel we in Western society in all probability don’t have as a lot of a necessity for bitcoin as different nations, and I feel that’s a very vital half that we attempt to cowl through the social side. Right here in the USA, ladies can open financial institution accounts, ladies receives a commission, ladies have jobs. That doesn’t apply to each different nation. The instance we put within the paper was this was a approach for them to have a job and have their worth that they’ve created not stolen from them.
Should you have a look at El Salvador, they’re very depending on worldwide remittances. Should you’re in El Salvador, plenty of these people which may migrate to the USA ship a refund dwelling.
Nicely, the cash they ship again dwelling might be going by a Western Union-type firm that takes their lower. Once more, I’ll level again to the paper however the quantity of effort that they need to undergo to get that cash, I don’t see how one can’t suppose that bitcoin doesn’t remedy a elementary drawback with the best way these financial rails are arrange.
Nichols: To maneuver on to the governance piece, you guys speak concerning the decentralization of Bitcoin, the incentives of miners, and the shortage of single factors of failure within the community. What worth for society do you suppose that kind of decentralization may provide?
Consolvo: The worth that it solves is that there’s nobody that may are available and abuse their energy. Should you simply look around the globe on the varied governments which have actually abused their energy over time, that’s a elementary situation. The best way the governance is constructed into the protocol — within the asset class usually — I feel inherently solves for that situation. I don’t ever have to fret if somebody’s gonna are available and freeze or seize my belongings or in the event that they’re gonna change the principles — say, to extend the 21-million provide — as a result of it helps their targets. They don’t have the power to try this and I feel that’s fairly highly effective and it’s not one thing that we’ve ever seen earlier than previous to Bitcoin.
![](https://bitcoinmagazine.com/.image/c_fit%2Ccs_srgb%2Cq_auto:good%2Cw_620/MjAyODY0MjE1MjU2NDc0Njky/primary---nichols---article-inline.png)
Nichols: For the final a part of this, I need to set the stage for what the Bitcoin neighborhood ought to be doing in terms of ESG — what’s the significance of partaking with people who find themselves ESG-minded for Bitcoin and Bitcoin corporations? That additionally leads into why KPMG is taking a look at Bitcoin by the ESG lens.
Consolvo: That is an especially vital matter for lots of corporations, one in all which is KPMG as nicely. When you consider these ESG proponents or ESG-minded individuals, it comes right down to training. Many of those ESG proponents simply suppose “oh, Bitcoin’s utilizing approach an excessive amount of vitality, that’s an issue, that’s not gonna match into my portfolio” or no matter else they may be utilizing bitcoin for. So I feel it comes again to training once more.
Nichols: What do you suppose integrating Bitcoin into the ESG dialog may yield? There’s clearly plenty of ESG funds investing in publicly traded corporations. So what can bitcoin miners particularly do? I feel that’s in all probability one of many largest sticking factors right here — what they’ll do to have interaction with that neighborhood to get them to see the significance of Bitcoin, for the explanations you simply stated.
Consolvo: I simply actually suppose it comes right down to training. I feel plenty of Bitcoin corporations are doing it, however it’s making individuals conscious of what worth Bitcoin truly offers. It’s dispelling among the myths and misconceptions about Bitcoin which are nonetheless on the market in the present day. However I do suppose that the physique of people that form of view Bitcoin as unhealthy for the setting, utilized by criminals and so forth., is beginning to dwindle. I feel it’s by no means going to totally dwindle for in all probability so long as I’m right here, however what they’ll do is simply proceed to make it identified what goal the miners remedy different than simply making a safe protocol for a speculative asset. I feel lots of people view it that approach. It’s much more than that.
Nichols: One factor that I feel just isn’t mentioned sufficient within the environmental dialog round bitcoin is its finite provide. There’s an enormous dialog round local weather change and the way we low cost the long run prices of local weather change again to the current. I’m questioning you probably have any ideas on the distinction in a reduction fee on a bitcoin commonplace versus a fiat commonplace.
Consolvo: What I view that may be very useful to Bitcoin is it actually promotes saving and never consuming. I feel we presently dwell in a consumption-based society and if you consider being a consumption-based society and the sum of money that we’ll print at varied occasions in an effort to jumpstart the financial system, that’s simply creating consumption. Should you’re an ESG proponent, I don’t see how one can have these two issues relate to one another — they’re contradictory. Should you’re going to be in a consumption-based financial system, you’re going to make use of assets and also you’re gonna have a huge effect on the setting, whereas bitcoin promotes saving, and should you’re saving, you’re not consuming. Subsequently that to me looks as if only a pure constructive influence on the setting over a protracted time period.
Nichols: Additionally, needing to exponentially develop GDP at a given share per 12 months in an open-ended method, that’s merely not a risk on a long-term time scale. So I feel that’s one thing that has gone underneath the radar so far as the environmental and social penalties.
Consolvo: That’s spot on. You’re inherently going to be having a major environmental influence primarily based on consuming that a lot and by assembly these GDP targets or inflation targets, and so forth.
Nichols: Lastly, what has the response to your report been?
Consolvo: The response has been fairly overwhelmingly constructive. I couldn’t have imagined the quantity of outreach that I used to be going to get from this paper previous to doing it. I figured the Bitcoin neighborhood could be very happy with it, and I even underestimated that. What I’m actually interested in is, what concerning the naysayers? Did I current something to them the place they stated to themselves, “You recognize what, I used to be mistaken about this. I by no means realized that bitcoin can do that or do this. I by no means realized that there’s individuals in Afghanistan which have an enormous want for it, or individuals in any of those nations with large hyperinflation”.
So I imply, these are the individuals I’m curious to listen to from.
Click on right here to obtain a PDF of this text.
This text is featured in Bitcoin Journal’s “The Major Concern”. Click on right here to get your Annual Bitcoin Journal Subscription.